Tag: 爱上海uv

Spurs can save £7m by buying Lo Celso in January as clause in loan revealed

first_imgAfter an almighty goalmouth scramble, the playmaker finally turned the ball in to open the scoring in Serbia.Jose Mourinho left him on the bench in his first two games in charge – the wins over West Ham and Olympiakos – but brought him on for the final two minutes against Bournemouth on Saturday.With Dele Alli back in red-hot form under the new manager and Spurs currently outside of the top four, Lo Celso has plenty to do if he is going to convince Daniel Levy to stump up the cash to complete the permanent transfer in the New Year.2 The Argentine has scored just once – in the Champions League against Red Star Belgrade – in his nine Spurs appearancesCredit: EPAMan United vs Tottenham FREE: Live stream, TV channel and kick-off time for Premier League clash TOTTENHAM can save £7million by making Giovani Lo Celso’s transfer permanent in January.The Argentine midfielder, 23, joined Spurs on a season-long loan from Real Betis in the summer.2 Giovani Lo Celso could join Tottenham permanently in January for £7m less than his summer feeCredit: Getty Images – GettyThere is a mandatory clause in the deal which says that Spurs must sign Lo Celso permanently at the end of the campaign should they qualify for the Champions League.After an initial £15m loan fee, he would cost the North Londoners £34m next summer – but Real Betis vice-chairman Jose Catalan revealed there is a cheaper option for Spurs.He told ABC de Sevilla: “The purchase option [for Lo Celso] can be exercised by this January market.”They would have to pay €32m (£27m).”In June [a €40m permanent deal] is mandatory if they get into the Champions League, and voluntary if not.”They will have to make the decision whether they buy or not.”Things have not quite gone to plan so far for the Argentine since arriving under compatriot Mauricio Pochettino on deadline day.Seen as a long-term successor to wantaway man Christian Eriksen, he has featured just nine times in all competitions but missed more than seven weeks of action due to a hip injury sustained on international duty in early September.Lo Celso’s only goal for the club so far came on November 6 when he bagged in the 4-0 win away at Red Star Belgrade.last_img read more

Read More

The Orwellian School of Wharton

first_imgThe University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton India Economic Forum recently revoked an invitation to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi to deliver a video-speech on March 23 after three Indian American professors mobilized campus and online protests.Several Indian activists have long accused Modi of complicity in the deadly Godhra communal riots of 2002 and overseas Indian groups have frequently rallied in opposition to his planned visits and speeches in the United States. He was denied entry in 2005 by the U.S. State Department for violating religious freedoms and remains person non granta, although he has spoken via videoconference to Indian trade groups from time to time.The United States has a long and ignominious history of suppressing leftist scholars, activists and artists, for which it has been frequently excoriated by international human rights groups. So, when progressive Indian groups seek to censor Modi by invoking those same discredited immigration laws and by intimidating the University of Pennsylvania, it is particularly odious and perverse. Censorship of political speech, no matter how objectionable its content or repulsive the messenger, is always reprehensible.We are no fans of Modi. Indeed, we believe he needs to be publicly grilled about his government’s failures and possible personal complicity in the Godhra massacres and the economic and political indignities Muslims still experience in his “vibrant” state.Toorjo Ghosh, an assistant professor at UPenn’s school of social policy, who mobilized the campaign with Ania Loomba and Suvir Kaul, two colleagues from the English department, was quoted in the media as saying: “The model that Narendra Modi has put forward is seriously flawed and is based on some extremely egregious flouting of human rights.” The petitioners complained that they found it “incomprehensible” that the Wharton students forum “wishes to celebrate [him] as an exemplar of economic and social development” or “endorse ideas about economic development that are based on the systematic oppression of minority populations” and help “whitewash Modi’s grim record and to grant him respectability.”They advocate “conscientious and efficacious modes of economic organization, not to piggy-back onto the inhuman policies of politicians who not only lack a commitment to human rights and to ideals of social justice, but whose political success is based on the suppression of substantial sections of their own citizens.”These are ringing words and exemplary goals. We wonder why these three astute advocates of democracy and their supporters feel so intellectually unequipped to engage Modi, who recently was reelected in a landslide, in an open public debate on these questions at a forum on their own territory.In a disingenuous “official statement,” the organizing committee asserted that it seeks “to present multiple opinions and ideas to our audiences and supporters across the world and constructively contribute to the intellectual milieu,” clarifying that “we do not endorse any political views and do not support any specific ideology.” All of that logically should prod them to welcome controversial ideas and speakers. But in UPenn’s Orwellian world, these students are as hapless as the ignorant faculty that seemingly tutor them, and so “must consider the impact on multiple stakeholders in our ecosystem.”Let’s get to the doublespeak, shall we: “Our team felt that the potential polarizing reactions from sub-segments of the alumni base, student body, and our supporters, might put Mr. Modi in a compromising position, which we would like to avoid….”The censorship of Modi by Wharton is borne of the same loom of intolerance his opponents inveigh against. Nothing, as they say, so resembles the North Pole as the South Pole. Related Itemslast_img read more

Read More

Mich Officials To Appeal Ruling Stopping Pay Deductions To Cover School Retirees

first_imgMichigan officials will appeal a ruling that declared unconstitutional a deduction of school employee pay to help pay post-retirement pension health care costs.The Associated Press: State Of Michigan To Appeal Ruling On School Retiree Health Care CostsThe state will appeal a ruling that declared unconstitutional a 3 percent deduction from school employee pay to support post-retirement health care, Gov. Rick Snyder said Tuesday. Snyder announced the appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court after signing a bill that will mean higher costs for most of Michigan’s nearly 475,000 public school employees and retirees. Snyder says the new law protects the pension plan for the long term (9/5).Detroit Free Press: State Of Michigan To Appeal Ruling On School Retiree Health Care CostsThe state will appeal a ruling that declared unconstitutional a 3 percent deduction from school employee pay to support post-retirement health care, Gov. Rick Snyder said Tuesday. Snyder announced the appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court after signing a bill that will mean higher costs for most of Michigan’s nearly 475,000 public school employees and retirees. Snyder says the new law protects the pension plan for the long term. In a 2-1 opinion in August, the Michigan Court of Appeals said a 2010 law that cut 3 percent from the pay of school employees impaired contracts and took private property without compensation or due process. The ruling could result in refunds of about $508 million being held in escrow (Egan, 9/5). Mich. Officials To Appeal Ruling Stopping Pay Deductions To Cover School Retirees’ Health Care Costs This is part of the KHN Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.last_img read more

Read More